Talk:Horizon Organic

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Food and drink Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Fair use rationale for Image:Horizon organic.jpg

Image:Horizon organic.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:44, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Section title: Controversy or Reception?

Hi E8, thanks for your comment on my talk page:

I view the "Controversy" heading as more appropriate, given the section contents. Its commonly used on WP, as is "Criticism;" in fact, the Dean Foods page has a controversy section with common content.--E8

Thanks also for resisting the temptation to edit war. I'm sure we can discuss this and come to an agreement. How about as a compromise we rename the section "Criticism"? What do you think?-- — Keithbob • Talk • 17:14, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Individually, this topics would be criticism. Collectively, and given the increasing breadth of issues, it indicates controversy. Again, why call it one thing at Dean Foods and another here? This topic is of low interest to me, and there many very well be specific rules pertaining to this that I'm unaware of, but I'm puzzled by what appears to be internal inconsistency.--E8 (talk) 23:50, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi E8, In my opinion the word 'controversy' creates an editorial POV and there are lots of inconsistencies on Wikipedia. It could be that the section in Dean Foods also needs to be changed to 'reception', so we shouldn't consider a possible mistake somewhere else as a reason to do something potentially wrong here on this article. There is an essay called WP:CRITICISM and that discourages special sections for criticism and says if they must exist they should be neutrally labelled. The essay says: "The word 'reception' is a neutral term that is often used in section titles in articles about books and films. The term 'criticism' may be appropriate if it is commonly used by the sources which discuss the topic. Likewise, sections or articles dedicated to 'controversies' should be avoided." [1] Another option is to mix the reception in with the rest of the article and just give a history of the company and let the 'critical' events be placed in their chronological order. Lumping them together is arbitrary and tends to give them undue weight. What do you think? PS: personally I don't buy Horizon, I use other organic brands because I don't like what I've heard about them. But... I don't think its fair to put my personal POV, or anyone's POV into a Wiki article. The article should present the information in a fair and neutral manner and let the reader decide for themselves whether the topic is controversial or not.-- — Keithbob • Talk • 19:29, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for linking the essay. In accordance, "Reception" seems like the most appropriate heading (I still think it's awkward).--E8 (talk) 22:59, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lawsuits

Horizon has attracted a number of lawsuits, somewhat unusual for an organic foods company, but not especially unusual for a large food processor, and most of these appear to have been dismissed. Dismissed lawsuits aren't typically notable enough for inclusion - I've removed one from the article and may remove more. The only settled suit I found was over evaporated cane juice, reflink, though I'm not sure if even this is notable enough to include.Dialectric (talk) 06:02, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Horizon Organic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:04, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Horizon Organic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:30, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]