Jump to content

Talk:Horsforth

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

It should be the Troy district, right? And an anonymous (and as far as I can see otherwise serious) writer has mentioned Robert the Bruce in a way that make no sense to me, can someone make anything out of it? Gunnar Larsson 23:36, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Can't help you with Robert the Bruce, but I'm pretty sure that the train station is in Cookridge, not Troy. I'm told there used to be two stations in Horsforth, and they closed the one that was actually in Horsforth. Terry 21:23, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The second station was located in the Newlay area of Horsforth, next to the river and canal, which was formerly a fairly industrial area. That station was closed in the 1960s(?) and lays on the Leeds to Shipley line.

There're 2 facts I heard about Hosforth that I'd like some clarity on please;

.Firstly I heard Horsforth was directly between London and Edinbourgh .Secondly I heard Horsforth was the largest village in Europe. Which also brings about the question as to whether Horsforth is a village or not. It has a town council, but doesn't have a town hall...

There is a monument on Abbey Road, at the entrance to Kirkstall Forge, that marks the halfway point between London and Edinburgh, and states that it is exactly 200 miles from each. However I'm not sure whether it was a viable journey even in the 19th century as what is now the A65 headed north west into the Dales and towards the Lakes, with the route north through Ilkley and Grassington not being attractive at the best of times. If there was a London - Leeds - Edinburgh through train, then it would have passed though Horsforth station, making the station the closest point to half way.

There is no definition of a village in English law, so Horsforth's status comes from not being incorporated into an Urban District Council in the 1930s, and I believe it only received its town status in or after the 1974 Local Government Act. Sfgreenwood 16:46, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why does this article refer to Horsforth as a town? It is not, never has been and never will be a town. Unbeknownst to most people in this "town", it used to (sort of) be independent of Leeds, but that was changed 35 years ago, why is Wikipedia not up to date? Stuff like this is most confusing to the schoolchildren of Horsforth, in fact, the whole Leeds article seems hell-bent on misrepresenting the city. Utterly useless for us teachers. Can it be brought up to date, please? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.107.22.143 (talk) 18:32, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is officially a town, as a civil parish was created in 1999 (a civil parish can call itself a town - see Civil parish#Names). Also it is referred to as a town by Leeds City Council. —Snigbrook 13:35, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Transport or Communications - Section Title

[edit]

Common name for a section dedicated to rail, road, etc., on other location related pages appears to be Transport and not Communications. I suggest this section is re-titles Transport and will do so unless there are objections listed here by 22 August, 2008. Ian --Ormers (talk) 22:09, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cannot see any problem with that. Keith D (talk) 22:26, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Just done. Ian --Ormers (talk) 22:08, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Status

[edit]

Horsforth was never a town; it was never granted town status. Just because it has a Civil Parish and so can call itself a town, it doesn't mean it is a town. Lots of places are civil parishes but far from being a town. What is a town? Somewhere like Harrogate or Huddersfield represents a town- clearly Horsforth is nothing like these places. It has been fully reliant on the city centre for government/economic drive for 35 years now, and was part of Leeds long before it officially became a suburb of the city. It claimed to be one of the largest villages of the UK until it became part of Leeds in 1974. Some people still consider it a village, but it is officially part of Leeds (and has been for 35 years now). Horsforth has been engulfed by Leeds and is no longer independent in any way, in exactly the same way that Chapel Allerton and Headingley have been engulfed by the expanding city of Leeds in the past. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.212.254.200 (talk) 22:44, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Horsforth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

☒N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool. - replaced link

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:50, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Horsforth/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

.
  1. Requires infobox  Done
  2. Geo-date needs modifying to allow use preference operation to work on it  Done
  3. Long lists need removing and replacing by prose
  4. Requires addition of inline references using one of the {{Cite}} templates
  5. Inline external links need moving to external links section or converting to references
Keith D 14:57, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 21:13, 8 October 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 18:16, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Horsforth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:17, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Horsforth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:54, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Horsforth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:53, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]