Talk:Howie Day

Howie Day was one of the Music good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 16, 2006	Good article nominee	Listed
May 24, 2006	Peer review	Reviewed
September 12, 2009	Good article reassessment	Delisted

Current status: Delisted good article

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Pop music

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

Maine Low‑importance

	Maine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Maine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MaineWikipedia:WikiProject MaineTemplate:WikiProject MaineMaine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

References are broken

Many of the references link to the USA Today article PaulSchreiber 07:25, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GA

I promoted this article from its nomination as it is well-written and sourced. Two things that need attention, however. First, the lead image needs source information and a fair use rationale. Second, that Trivia section needs to go, both for being a trivia section and being one sentence long. Staxringold 14:56, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers for taking the time to review the article :) In response to your concerns, I've incorporated the trivia section into the article proper and, more importantly, have replaced the lead image with an official promotional photo with fair use rationale. Thanks again! Idp 21:38, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Australia

Can someone say why the album is called "Australia"? Raphaelandrews 12:28, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Genre

What genre do they play?

Don't you mean HE...Howie Day is a person not a band. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.111.255.137 (talk) 04:09, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CUA article

The references for this were not only broken links but sourced from a POV article which was in turn sourced from a forum post, so not a particularly valid reference. Have removed the entire line about this, as no more information or sources were given. Feel free to put it back if you feel it makes a valid point. Ukdmbfan 14:48, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Voice Type

Quite a lot of articles have this. Should we include one for Howie Day too?--62.209.19.224 (talk) 18:06, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Howie Day/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

Starting GA reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps process. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:55, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

To uphold the quality of Wikipedia:Good articles, all articles listed as Good articles are being reviewed against the GA criteria as part of the GA project quality task force. While all the hard work that has gone into this article is appreciated, unfortunately, as of September 12, 2009, this article fails to satisfy the criteria, as detailed below. For that reason, the article has been delisted from WP:GA. However, if improvements are made bringing the article up to standards, the article may be nominated at WP:GAN. If you feel this decision has been made in error, you may seek remediation at WP:GAR.

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
One instance of weasel words which has been tagged. The lead does not fully summarise the artcile which it should, see WP:MOS.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
I found three dead links which gave been tagged. The referencing style used is not consistent leading to inconsistencies in reference numbering. I have also placed a tag for a section that needs referencing - early life, piano lessons. howiefan.com is not a reliable source; ref #2 (the first one needs to be more specific than just the base url;
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
On hold for above issues to be fixed. Major contributors and projects will be informed. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:13, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AS no attempt has been made to address any of these points I am delisting this article. The notice at the top states how you can challenge this decision, or if it is improved it can be re-nominated. Jezhotwells (talk) 17:40, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sources Clean Up

Certain sources, particularly those in the introduction paragraphs lead to unrelated links, 4+7 were the ones I noticed, they lead to glamourising bios rather than the sources regarding Day's legal troubles they're intended to take you to. Being fairly unexperienced in that portion of editting I may have time to attempt resolving the issue later this week, but if someone had the time and energy to take care of it in the mean time, that would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! Bliss 182 (talk) 05:44, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Howie Day. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive {newarchive} to http://secure.laweekly.com/music/music/will-jam-4-food/4014/
Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20060501042036/http://www1.whdh.com:80/news/articles/local/BO18511/ to http://www1.whdh.com/news/articles/local/BO18511/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:37, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Howie Day. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:55, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References in notes section but not cited in text

When changing the references into a consistent style, I found that these references were included in the references section but not cited in the body text:

Note name: WMA. "Howie Day. Biography" (PDF). William Morris Agency. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-03-30. Retrieved April 11, 2006.
Note name: Pollstar. "HotStar Howie Day". Pollstar. February 3, 2003. Archived from the original on 2004-11-17. Retrieved April 11, 2006.
Note name: RollingStone_Australia. Walters, Barry (July 2, 2002). "Album reviews. Howie Day — Australia". Rolling Stone. Archived from the original on 2007-10-27. Retrieved April 11, 2006.
Note name: AMG_Australia. McCartney, Kelly. "Australia > Overview". Allmusic. Retrieved April 11, 2006.
Note name: Popmatters_Australia. Grossman, Adam (June 14, 2002). "Australia Review". Popmatters.com. Archived from the original on 2006-06-14. Retrieved April 11, 2006.
Note name: USAToday. "Singer Howie Day arrested in Wisconsin". USA Today. The Associated Press. March 28, 2004. Retrieved April 12, 2006.
Note name: MSNBC_arrest. "Howie Day arrested for airborne rowdiness". Today. The Associated Press. December 23, 2005. Retrieved April 12, 2006.
Note name: MSNBC_dating_spears. Walls, Jeannette (April 5, 2007). "Has Britney found yet another rehab romance?". MSNBC. Retrieved December 22, 2019.

DferDaisy (talk) 20:29, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]