Talk:Hundreds of Cornwall

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Maps Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Maps and Cartography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MapsWikipedia:WikiProject MapsTemplate:WikiProject MapsMaps articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.
	This article had an importance automatically assigned to it. Once it has been checked by a human, please remove `\|autoi=yes`.

UK geography Mid‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cornwall Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cornwall, an attempt to improve and expand Wikipedia coverage of Cornwall and all things Cornish. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project member page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.CornwallWikipedia:WikiProject CornwallTemplate:WikiProject CornwallCornwall-related articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

See drop-down box for suggested article edit guidelines:

Be bold - if you know something about Cornwall then put it in! We value your contributions and don't be afraid if your spelling isn't great as there are plenty of spelling and grammar experts on clean-up duty!
Articles on settlements in Cornwall should be written using the standard set of headings approved by the UK geography WikiProject's guideline How to write about settlements.
At WikiProject Cornwall we subscribe to the policies laid down by Wikipedia - particularly civility and consensus building. We are aware that the wording on Cornish entries can sometimes be a contentious topic, especially those concerning geography. You don't have to agree with everything but there is no excuse for rudeness and these things are best solved through consensus building and compromise. For more information see WP:CornwallGuideline.
These pages are not platforms for political discussion. Issues relating to Cornish politics should be restricted to those pages that directly deal with these issues (such as Constitutional status of Cornwall, Cornish nationalism, etc) and should not overflow into other articles.
Most of all have fun editing - that's the reason we all do this, right?!

Untitled

I don't know of the word cantrev being used in traditional Cornish. The forms I've seen are kev(e)rang (and conteth?), but I can't even give a definite provenance for either at the moment. The spelling cantrev would be unlikely in traditional Cornish (you'd probably see cantreff or similar) while revived Cornish would spell it as kantrev or cantref, depending on the school of orthography. But kevrang is the real McCoy. Quartier Latin1968 05:07, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article is pretty dreadful for the reasons stated here by others. Kevrangs are NOT hundreds. They don't mean 'hundred' they mean 'muster together' in Cornish. Cantref in Welsh does mean Hundred, but a Kevrang certainly DOES NOT. The word Cantref is NOT used in Cornish. Several Kevrangs contain multiple hundreds and are more like the size of Rutland. Pydar (Cornish 'four' hundred fighting mean). Trigg (Cornish 'three' hundred fighting men), Wivelshire (East and West, two hundred each). In this sense they may function more like counties and less like hundreds: We don't know how they function and should say so rather than making it up. There is no evidence that Athelstan had anything to do with the system of Kevrang, in fact the opposite is true since they are NOT hundreds: They seem to be a native form of administration and imply that the Cornish were left alone by Athelstan. I am surprised by the lack of reading done by the editors of this article. I suggest starting with Charles Thomas 'Celtic Britain' and follow his bibliography. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.233.112.55 (talk) 12:55, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

evidence

The introductory paragraph is unsatisfactory: at present it is mere assertion without any references or documentary evidence (apart from the Gover one about the first appearance in a document of a word), not what one expects from an encyclopedia.

It is unhelpful to claim that the administration of Cornwall was “wholly different” from that of the rest of England and also to claim that it “mirrored” England’s.

The comments about constables are unsatisfactory. Law and order in the years after the Conquest were managed at the primary settlement level by tithings not parishes and this applies to Cornwall and the rest of England; we have the records of the eyres to prove it. Parishes in the rest of England had constables too.

The word shire is used in history (and today) not only for counties but also for smaller districts within shires/counties. It is claimed here, without evidence, that “shires in Cornwall mirrored the administrative apparatus of shires in England” and “the Cornish cantrev replicated England's shire system on a smaller scale.” I take this to mean that the shires in Cornwall were the equivalent of the shires in the rest of England not non-county smaller districts. Did the shires of Cornwall have the apparatus of counties? A sheriff each and a shire court for example? Please give evidence for the claim of equivalence. The county of Cornwall did have a sheriff and shire court and hundred courts.

Please put up the documentary evidence for the opening sentences and claims made therein, including the use of the word cantrev.Crococolana 01:09, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have amended the entry to remove unsourced material. Crococolana 18:25, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hundreds

Should articles on hundreds be titled Foo (hundred) or Hundred of Foo? Input and comments please at: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_UK_geography#Hundreds. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 09:44, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rewrite

I'm looking at completely overhauling the structure of this article and adding a huge amount of missing material to it, plus weeding out some irrelevant things. I'm working on this in my sandbox, if anyone has any suggestions let me know. Bodrugan (talk) 11:46, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]