Jump to content

Talk:Hurricane Charley (1986)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

  • This is a nice little article. I have been through it and find nothing to criticize. I enjoyed reading it.

GA review (see here for criteria)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): Clearly written b (MoS): Follows the relevant parts of MoS
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): Well referenced b (citations to reliable sources): The sources are reliable c (OR): No OR
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): Covers the broad areas b (focused): Remains focused on article topic
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias: Neutral
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.: Stable
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Congratuations! Nicely done.

Mattisse (Talk) 18:05, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]