Jump to content

Talk:Hurricane Danny (1997)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured articleHurricane Danny (1997) is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on July 17, 2011.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 21, 2006Good article nomineeListed
December 28, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
March 15, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
December 15, 2007Featured article candidatePromoted
December 22, 2011Featured topic candidatePromoted
April 30, 2023Featured article reviewDemoted
January 22, 2024Featured topic removal candidateDemoted
Current status: Former featured article

Content?

[edit]

If we can't find some more content this one should probably be merged. Jdorje 06:58, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is that better? I think that is more than a stub and a start, so hopefully it won't be merged. If you're curious, the only reason I did this was to keep having one storm article for every year. Hurricanehink 20:55, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Todo

[edit]

Some impact and satellite pictures would be nice. Jdorje 21:51, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Great...next problem is the pictures are not PD as was claimed. Can we still use them? Jdorje 22:07, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Really? I thought if they were a product of the US government, it was OK. Plus, there was no copyright info on the page at all, located here. Well, this page is a bit different from 2 days ago, to say the least. I personally hope all hurricane articles will eventually have as much information as this one does. Hurricanehink 22:20, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The PDF is from the US government, but the pictures are credited to the AP. And yes, I hope all hurricane articles will have this much info...if every article is at least B-class we will be in good shape. Jdorje 22:32, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oh. No idea. Should they be removed? Should we ask an admin? Hurricanehink 22:47, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure. I imagine it qualifies as fair use. Jdorje 23:01, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Todo2

[edit]

Preparations and aftermath. — jdorje (talk) 07:13, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yea, then after finishing stupid (sorry to anyone who thinks that the metric system is awestome) metrication stuff and completing inline sourcing, this should be able to pass as a GA. íslenska hurikein #12 (samtal) 18:42, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Now for the refs... íslenska hurikein #12 (samtal) 19:46, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
All done with the refs now. íslenska hurikein #12 (samtal) 18:43, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GA? íslenska hurikein #12 (samtal) 21:08, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yea, sure. Hurricanehink (talk) 21:26, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures

[edit]

If you guys havent noticed, someone deleted the damaged and flooding pictures Storm05 14:11, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I did. They weren't fair use, so I nominated them for deletion. Hurricanehink 15:18, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GA passed

[edit]

Great job folks! I would expand everthing, perhaps add some (verifiable) anecdotal tales to make the storm more living (for lack of a better word). But overall, nice article, especially for such a small storm.--Esprit15d 12:49, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FA passed

[edit]

Congrats Hello! Juliancolton (talk) 17:09, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Hurricane Danny (1997). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:15, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hurricane Danny (1997). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:06, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Reference format inconsistencies
  • Needs alt text
  • duplicate links
  • Has some academic representation, however, there is a decent bit more out there.

Sending to WP:FARGIVEN since the main FAC contributor is inactive. CCI check not done. NoahTalk 01:30, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]