Talk:Hurricane Newton (1986)

Hurricane Newton (1986) was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 22, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed
?	Good article reassessment	Delisted

Current status: Delisted good article

Warning: invalid date '15:38, August 17, 2024‎' detected in parameter 'action2date' (help).

Weather: Tropical / Eastern Pacific Low‑importance

	Weather portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This redirect is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Low-importance).
	This redirect is supported by the Pacific hurricane work group (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hurricane Newton (1986)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hurricanefan25 (talk · contribs) 21:21, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Hurricane Newton was one of the the two storms that was intercepted Hurricane Hunter flights" — I think you mean "that was intercepted by Hurricane Hunter flights"
Yeah. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane
"A tropical depression formed near Central America on September 18." — There's a bit of pre-tropical cyclonegenisis in the MH that you could put before that
- It's only the lead, and that genesis stuff happens all the time in the EPAC. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane
"The hurricane reached its peak intensity at about 85 mph (145 km/h)" — Rewrite this as "the hurricane reached its peak winds of about 85 mph (145 km/h)"
- huh? Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane
"However, the remnants of Newton" — remove "however"
- Meh, ok. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane
"The origins of Newton are from an area of disturbed weather" — Personally, I feel this sounds a bit strange. "Newton originated from an area of disturbed weather"
"...noted the threat high waves, storm surge, and flooding." — That always happens, don't feel that that's needed
- Not so much in the EPAC, I've never seen the EPHC note stuff like that before.Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 21:46, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"Damage in Mexico was minor with roofs being ripped off and blowing down trees and utility poles." — The roofs blew down trees and utility poles? :P
- Fixed. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 21:46, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"...for parts of western Texas, New Mexico, and Arizona as Newton, along with a cold front over the Great Plains..." — either mention the cold front first or last
- First. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 21:46, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"Across Kansas City, Missouri, 20,000 customers were without power since heavy rainfall downed power lines." This sounds awkward as the last sentence of the impact section. IMO, putting the highest rainfall of the associated cold front/Newton last is better
- AFAIK, you are suppose to put meto statistics first.
  - Disagree, but I'll accept that. HurricaneFan 25 22:10, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Use consistent date formats for the refs
- Fixed. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 21:46, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Passing! HurricaneFan 25 22:10, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]