Jump to content

Talk:Hurricane Norbert (1984)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleHurricane Norbert (1984) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 15, 2011Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 23, 2011.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Hurricane Norbert fluctuated from a Category 3 to Category 4 three times in two days?

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Hurricane Norbert (1984)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hurricanehink (talk · contribs) 14:00, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing as we're both in the WikiCup, I figured I'd do you the favor of reviewing your article.

That's pretty much it. Have you tried finding any more info related to Norbert's remnants in AZ? I'll put it on hold for a period of seven days, blah blah blah. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 14:00, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review. YE Pacific Hurricane
Have you asked David Roth about making a rainfall map for the storm? --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 14:52, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It already used in the article :P YE Pacific Hurricane 14:06, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I meant the map itself. And have you inquired why Arizona is not included in those maps? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 14:52, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The map is not that useful was the rainfall was not extreme. If I had to make a guess, Arizona is not included due to lack of rainfall data. YE Pacific Hurricane 05:09, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge?

[edit]

I redid the storm subsection with all relevant information I could find, and it fits easily within that section. Thus, I don't think we really need this article. Thoughts Hurricanehink, Yellow Evan, Cyclonebiskit? TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk · contributions) 01:34, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    • There's a couple AP and UPI news articles that I still need to get to the bottom off and access via LexisNexis to maybe fledge it out a little more, but I've added some relevant information from the sources of the season section that does cover more content that's currently in the season section. YE Pacific Hurricane 04:47, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral. Seeing as the season article is only ~28 kb worth of readable text, Norbert is only ~5 kb (excluding lead), and Odile is only ~4 kb (again excluding lead), I think Norbert should only be merged if Odile is. Norbert and Odile together currently make up 3.8 kb worth of readable prose in the main article (or 14% of the season article). If both articles were merged in full without any rewriting, the ~9 kb of readable prose would be 27% of the season article's total readable prose. Not too unreasonable. I'd like to see what the sections would look like if all of the content from both articles were integrated (so making sure that no information in either article was missing from the section). I wouldn't mind seeing three paragraphs for both storms. Given that the season article is already up for GA nom, I believe now would be a good time to merge both. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 04:08, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]