Talk:Hypericum sect. Adenotrias

GA icon symbolizing Good topic candidates on Wikipedia.

Hypericum sect. Adenotrias is the main article of the "Hypericum sect. Adenotrias" series, a current good topic candidate. A good topic should exemplify Wikipedia's very best work, and is therefore expected to meet several criteria. Please feel free to leave comments.

Hypericum sect. Adenotrias has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: September 9, 2024. (Reviewed version).

Hypericaceae: Plants Mid‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Hypericaceae, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the plant family Hypericaceae and related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.HypericaceaeWikipedia:WikiProject HypericaceaeTemplate:WikiProject HypericaceaeHypericaceae articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Plants (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review

Passed. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 04:08, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hypericum sect. Adenotrias/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Fritzmann2002 (talk · contribs) 00:36, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Rollinginhisgrave (talk · contribs) 10:25, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be reviewing this article over the next few days. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 10:25, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prose and content

YH. aciferum has been evaluated as endangered since the 1980s this appears to be out of date according to the body

I've clarified the summary in the lead

which refers to glands can you mention here why this reference is made?

I'm not sure what the recommendation is; the sources don't say why the section was named as such, in case that's what you're asking

YHypericum prolificum is also known as "shrubby St. John's wort" which might cause some confusion.

I've added a footnote

YLink Spathulenol
Yrusseggeri is has

Suggestions

but is now protected -> although it is now protected

Incorporated into the rewrite of the sentence

Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 03:58, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rollinginhisgrave, I believe I've addressed everything. Let me know if you have any other input! Fritzmann (message me) 20:09, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

[5] Y
[6] Y
[10] AGF (German)
[15] clock I couldn't find "have five sepals and five petals." in this section, could you quote it for me?

"Sepals 5... Petals 5" in the description paragraph before the Key to the Section. Fritzmann (message me) 16:58, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[20] Y
[25] Y
[30] Y

Other

Neutral Y
No COPYVIO/OR, 11.5% Earwig Y
Broad / summary style Y
Stable Y
Images, all appropriately tagged Y

Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 10:04, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Rollinginhisgrave: any other issues with the article? Fritzmann (message me) 19:01, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.