Talk:I'm Gonna Love You Just a Little More Baby

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on I'm Gonna Love You Just a Little More Baby. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130920064608/http://infodisc.fr/Bilan_W.php to http://www.infodisc.fr/Bilan_W.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:46, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sleeves and label

@JGabbard: I appreciate the "consensus" (or portion of it?) favoring artworks used for singles. However, ~~preferably,~~ successful releases of many older songs produced in their own source countries, like the US or the UK, lacked picture sleeves, and not using the labels would make readers think the labels are non-important just because they aren't artworks, which newer singles of this century have been using. Well, I looked up old discussions, and I found one of them, which I started.

I don't know why a talk page is appropriate for non-free images, especially when two editors disagree on which images to use and are unable to compromise and bots would eventually add "orphaned" tags on certain images. I think about reinserting the label and then taking all three to FFD for bigger attention, citing NFCC#3a and #8. Also, I created cropped versions of free images of Barry White. Alternatively, if you think FFD is not the way to go, then I would prefer replacing the German cover with the US side label and leave the Dutch one remaining. Thoughts?

BTW, I hate to admit that using front covers is very tempting and impulsive (mainly because of great artwork), but I prefer to use artworks for singles from 1990s and thereafter. I still don't know why some editors don't bother to insert (or correct) captions describing accurately what the images are part of.

(Back then, before switching my preferences to side labels, I didn't even consider which editions use the picture or generic sleeves, where the songs were originally produced, what nationalities and birth places of artists were, and what songs were primarily targeted to. I just used artworks primarily to differentiate from pre-existing covers that were already used, i.e. using artworks as "alternative covers".) George Ho (talk) 03:42, 14 September 2019 (UTC); edited, 03:46, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@George Ho: Thank you for your reply, George. I like side labels too, and occasionally upload them myself when no picture sleeve art is available. They do have some value, aesthetic and otherwise. And I will make extra effort to include captions on picture sleeves, because that can also be helpful information. That being said, I am not fond of your proposal. The German sleeve has clearer lettering as well as a nice photo of the artist. But I did not upload either image, so I strongly feel that input from other editors is needed. - JGabbard (talk) 04:07, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Took the images to Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2019 September 14. George Ho (talk) 05:54, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]