Talk:ICER (file format)
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
On 4 December 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from ICER to ICER (file format). The result of the discussion was moved. |
History and development
[edit]Does someone have information regarding the history and development of the ICER codec? Who created it and at which organization/site? --DBBell (talk) 22:59, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- Basically all of the sources cited in the article seem to be self-published by JPL/NASA. Is the topic notable? — BarrelProof (talk) 00:20, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Comparisons to JPEG 2000 seem irrelevant
[edit]Over half of this article compares the ICER format to JPEG 2000. It sounds almost like a sales pitch, as in the section, "Design commonalities with the JPEG2000 compressor." There are already plenty of comparisons between the two formats on the JPEG 2000 page.
Could someone rewrite this article to focus more on ICER and less on this other format? --Charizardpal (talk) 04:19, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on ICER. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090706080635/http://web99.arc.nasa.gov/~vgulick/GSOM/LPSC2000/SPEC_Path.pdf to http://web99.arc.nasa.gov/~vgulick/GSOM/LPSC2000/SPEC_Path.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:56, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
Requested move 4 December 2023
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 05:59, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
– No primary topic. The nonprofit Institute for Clinical and Economic Review gets more page views than the file format, and Google Scholar results return a wide variety of topics in which the file format does not prominently figure. ICER file format doesn't appear to be an expandable acronym. (t · c) buidhe 22:08, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support. The file format is certainly not a primary topic, since I can't find any mention of it with a web search for independent third-party sources. The only sources cited in the article are self-published by the institution that designed the format. There is also a highly respected annual scholarly conference and Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. — BarrelProof (talk) 04:08, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:50, 7 December 2023 (UTC)