Talk:Information security operations center

Computer Security: Computing Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Mid-importance).

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

POV Discussion

Surprise, surprise. The only reference to the first sentence of this article when searching through Google is the article itself. I couldn't actually decide how to dispute this article and what tags to include because so many of them apply. Although this drive-by does nothing to help the article, and it is not intended as a badge of shame, this article desperately needs work. It's kind of embarrassing for anyone trying to promote IT security. 96.51.153.243 (talk) 00:46, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The POV concern is neither specific, nor clear. The dispute has no real substance and its tone is unfortunate. The article lacks references simply because it originally established the emerging idea of an ISOC, which has now been widely accepted in the security industry and beyond. Given the absence of anything meaningful this POV issue should be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cartermichael (talk • contribs) 04:07, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done. The article isn't great, but a SOC is a real thing and there's no apparent POV. Snori (talk) 08:46, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest to remove the 'Smart SOC' section, it appears to be a product description and also does not have a single source. 193.187.235.17 (talk) 13:00, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, at least the Smart seems to be part of a product Name and security operations center is what the article is about. Rasos (talk) 12:23, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]