Talk:International Space Station/GA2
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I will review this article. Robert Skyhawk (Talk to me) 18:48, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
Review by Robert Skyhawk
[edit]GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- The writing is very reader-friendly; there weren't any parts that I couldn't understand. Good wikilinking too.
- B. MoS compliance:
- Solid lead section, and no complaints about the body.
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- I believe this article easily passes the criteria; I will promote it to GA status. Congratulations to all involved editors. Robert Skyhawk (Talk to me) 20:10, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
- Pass or Fail: