Talk:Intersection
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
This topic is in need of attention from an expert on the subject. The section or sections that need attention may be noted in a message below. |
Untitled
[edit]Should this article exist? How is it's topic or content distinct from that of Intersection (set theory). Perhaps there are advanced theories such as intersection in (co)homology, but in that case shouldn't this article be about the category theoretic interpretation of intersection (clearly not). Unless someone can come up with a reason for its existence I think it should be removed. SymplectoJim (talk) 14:50, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- I agree, it seems this has significant overlap (or I guess you could say, intersection) with the intersection (set theory) page. IllQuill (talk) 05:49, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
- see discussion on intersection (set theory) where I propose deleting/merging this page and turning it into a disambiguation between intersection (set theory) and intersection (Euclidean geometry) IllQuill (talk) 06:15, 16 January 2021 (UTC)