Jump to content

Talk:Iowa Highway 160

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleIowa Highway 160 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 27, 2012Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Iowa Highway 160/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 17:23, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
    See comment section below. Good.
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    This article is pass worthy but please see comment section below.Pass!--Dom497 (talk) 02:21, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]
  • In the lead of the article, "short state highway that runs from west to east in central Iowa", are you saying that the highway only travels one way (west to east)? If the highway is a two direction highway then the wording should be changed to, "short state highway that runs west and east in central Iowa". Please clarify for me.--Dom497 (talk) 18:04, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. You are correct. –Fredddie 22:27, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have passed the article.--Dom497 (talk) 02:21, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]