Jump to content

Talk:Irreligion in Russia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Is this true?

[edit]

See poll here concerning Pussy Riot case, surely most Russians aren't secular or they wouldn't have approved of this - http://www.levada.ru/31-07-2012/rossiyane-o-dele-pussy-riot

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Irreligion in Russia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:59, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please add Russian analysis of the personhood of god

[edit]

Is personhood more fundamental than the Universe?
Can a person (for example god) be shaped without an environment?
Information theory doesn't apply to the thinking process of god?

Add specific links of Russian atheists and theists.
We should make a specific page named: The personhood of god as examined by Russian scholars
It's not weird to be analytical about a specific field of study.
It's weird and improper to be lazy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:587:4114:6100:8488:4981:EF3C:463D (talk) 10:36, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

YOU do it. Go to WP:AFC and prepare a summary that cite some professionally-published mainstream academic or journalistic sources. Ian.thomson (talk) 10:47, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, what?

[edit]

So the article states that "At least as of 1899, it was not allowed to have any religion". This doesn't make any sense. In fact, the contrary is true, i.e. is was banned to voluntarily leave Orthodox Christinaty, the state religion. This mistake should be corrected. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.180.47.145 (talk) 09:37, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Irreligion in Russia"

[edit]

"Irreligion was the official state policy during the Soviet Union and was rigorously enforced"

Not Irreligion, Atheism.

Irreligion is the idea of Agnosticism and similiar. However, in Soviet Russia, the forced worldview was the worldview of Atheism. This is even seen in the own soviet books.

Religion and God werent ignored - they were denied and "fought" against. Oliverz144 (talk) 22:32, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]