Talk:Isha Judd
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
References
[edit]I am trying to modify this article for it to meet the wikipedia requirements. However, my edits are being marked as having insufficient references. Could this be because some of the references I have used are to articles in spanish? Please help me to improve this article.
Many thanks
Sankara108 (talk) 17:41, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
- The trouble is that your references rarely substantiate the statements ascribed to them. You should also read WP:V#Non-English sources. HrafnTalkStalk 17:56, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
Another bunch of isha.com-hosted, isha.com-translated clippings from generally unknown-to-wikipedia (El Universal (Mexico City) being the sole exception) magazines of unknown (but doubtful) reliability. I would request that you source this article to something other than Isha's own clipping service. HrafnTalkStalk 15:02, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
There is a site dedicated to the negative side of Isha and I think it is only fair to add it as a reference. The original article is a self servig piece of publicity.
http://galaxio.blogspot.mx/2011/02/isha-foro-de-ex-seguidores.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.103.69.160 (talk) 19:51, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
- Blogs are generally not considered reliable. Regardless of accuracy, I don't think this source should be included. --Chris (talk) 19:53, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
- Picking this up 10 years later... Blogs can sometimes be RS but need to be taken with caution. The problem with this article is that at the moment, the only sources come directly from the subject of the article, or are clearly puff pieces parroting the PR script. I think the blogs should be included, or we count this article as not-notable and mark it for deletion. It would be really good to get a reliable 3rd party source description Judd and her philosophy. It seems like new age with maybe a bit of Hinduism and pop psychology, but we really need sources. Ashmoo (talk) 08:49, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- Start-Class biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- WikiProject Australia articles
- Start-Class Women writers articles
- Low-importance Women writers articles
- WikiProject Women articles
- WikiProject Women writers articles