Talk:Isotopes of rhodium

Half-life of OO45Rh 104

After the OO45Rh 102 reaches it isotope with the maximum OO45Rh isotope stability halflife value (29 years, Logsecond=7.96), the OE45Rh 103 isotope is the only stable 45Rh isotope. Then the next isotope OO45Rh 104 is reported to drop in halflife value to only 4.36min (logsecond=2.42). Then the next OO45Rh 106 isotope recovers to a halflife of 2.18 hours (logsecond=3.89). This low value of the isotope OO45Rh 104 is an irregularity in the stability halflife profile of the OO45Rh Rhodium isotopes.WFPM (talk) 20:34, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Isotopes of rhodium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:19, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Negative isomer excitation energy?

For Rhodium-110m (and possibly Rhodium-108m, but that one has wider uncertainty), the excitation energy is listed as negative. Shouldn't the base state always be the one with the lowest energy? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.183.206.186 (talk) 17:05, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]