Talk:Italian Army ranks

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Culture / European / Italian

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military culture, traditions, and heraldry task force
	European military history task force
	Italian military history task force (c. 500–present)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): RIP Papa Franku 2011-2017.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:56, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merge the articles

There are now 3 articles about the Italian Army ranks: One has all ranks, but no text (Italian Army Ranks), the two other have text, but lack all the Warrant Officers. These three articles need to be merged in one. If no one else does it, I will do it- BUT I would like to know first what layout style should be used: either the one in Italian Army Ranks, which I translated from the Italian version or should it be in this style: Spanish Army Ranks??? noclador 22:34, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mhmm, both the versions give some informations that the other don't give. So I don't know... choose the one you like best and merge the missed informations. --F l a n k e r 11:39, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Italian Army homepage:

These are the current and official ranks of the Italian Army. All other rank insignias are FAKE!! --noclador 19:49, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Protection

I have protected this article and the template for 7 days. I hope either contact the other and discuss. If, by the time the protection expires, either continues edit warring, I would consider blocking you due three revert rule violation. -- ReyBrujo 19:48, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since it appears one of the sides is a sockpuppet of a banned user, I am lowering this to semiprotection. -- ReyBrujo 00:19, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NATO equivalences

The document http://www.esercito.difesa.it/root/equipaggiamenti/gradi_270906.pdf shows NATO equivalences as:

OF-9 Generale
OF-8 Generale di corpo d'armata
OF-7 Generale di divisione
OF-6 Generale di brigata
OF-5 Colonnello
OF-4 Tenente Colonnello
OF-3 Maggiore
OF-2 Primo capitano
OF-2 Capitano
OF-1 Tenente
OF-1 Sottotenente

OR-9 Primo maresciallo luogotenente
OR-9 Primo maresciallo
OR-9 Maresciallo capo
OR-8 Maresciallo ordinario
OR-8 Maresciallo
? Sergente maggiore capo
OR-6 Sergente maggiore
OR-5 Sergente
OR-4 Caporale maggiore capo scelto
OR-4 Caporale maggiore capo
OR-4 Caporale maggiore scelto
OR-4 Primo caporalmaggiore
OR-4 Caporale maggiore
OR-3 Caporale scelto
OR-2 Caporale
OR-1 Soldato —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.88.202.219 (talk) 14:40, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sottotenente

Is this equivalent to Sub Lieutenant (which is what this article links)? or to Second Lieutenant (which is the interwiki for it:sottotenente)? or can it mean either (both are given as translations in my Collins-Sansoni dictionary)? Ian Spackman (talk) 10:21, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

you found error here! it must link to Second Lieutenant and not Sub Lieutenant! Sub Lieutenant is the literal translation, but the correct corresponding rank in English is actually a Second Lieutenant. --noclador (talk) 18:26, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for that prompt response! Ian Spackman (talk) 18:43, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]