Talk:Italian cruiser Zara
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Italian cruiser Zara article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Italian cruiser Zara has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: August 9, 2016. (Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Italian cruiser Zara/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 03:01, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
With a few minor grammatical tweaks that I took care of, the article complies with MOS policies pertaining to grammar, as well as general layout. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 22:21, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
- (a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct
- (b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation
The article refers to a decent quantity of reliable publications; no signs of original research. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 22:20, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
- (a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline
- (b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)
- (c) it contains no original research
The article sufficiently covers all relevant aspects of its topic. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 22:19, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
- (a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic
- (b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)
The article maintains an unbiased approach to its subject. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 22:18, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Since at least late 2013, the article has not been subjected to any form of disruptive editing. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 21:59, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
The images used in the article are all freely licensed, suitably captioned, and relevant to the topic. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 21:57, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
- (a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content
- (b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions
The article qualifies for GA, based on my analysis. Congratulations! Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 22:22, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Warfare good articles
- GA-Class military history articles
- GA-Class maritime warfare articles
- Maritime warfare task force articles
- GA-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- GA-Class Italian military history articles
- Italian military history task force articles
- GA-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles
- GA-Class Ships articles
- All WikiProject Ships pages
- GA-Class Shipwreck articles
- Low-importance Shipwreck articles
- GA-Class Italy articles
- Low-importance Italy articles
- All WikiProject Italy pages