Talk:JDS Akishio
Appearance
JDS Akishio has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: August 29, 2017. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:JDS Akishio/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 20:48, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
I'll take this for review. Parsecboy (talk) 20:48, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
- It doesn't make sense, structurally, to talk about construction, then the design, then the narrative of the boat's career. It's to combine the narrative elements and leave the technical stuff by itself.
Done
- Watch ENGVAR - templates are putting out British spellings but American spellings are used elsewhere.
- Done
- Check again - the infobox still has draft instead of draught. Parsecboy (talk) 12:28, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
- Done
- What makes seaforces.org a reliable source?
- Their about page says that all information comes from governmental or industrial sources. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 18:44, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
- Based on previous discussions at WP:RS/N (thinking specifically of the evaluation of Navweaps here), that doesn't make the site reliable - they would tell you to cite those sources directly. Parsecboy (talk) 12:26, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
- I've removed it. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 20:36, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
- Based on previous discussions at WP:RS/N (thinking specifically of the evaluation of Navweaps here), that doesn't make the site reliable - they would tell you to cite those sources directly. Parsecboy (talk) 12:26, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
- Their about page says that all information comes from governmental or industrial sources. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 18:44, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
- Same for sous.marins.musees.free.fr.
- Done I have removed this one. -- Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 18:46, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
- This provides a bit of info on the controversial nature of the museum of which Akishio is a part.
- I will work on it. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 13:58, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- Done
- I will work on it. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 13:58, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- The image checks out, copyright-wise, but it ought to have a caption. Parsecboy (talk) 20:57, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
Done
- @Iazyges: - it's been a couple of weeks - have you lost track of this? Parsecboy (talk) 12:02, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Parsecboy: yeah I forgot about this; I'll try to work on it later today if I can. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 12:37, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
- Sounds good, there's no rush. Parsecboy (talk) 12:54, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Parsecboy: I believe I have done everything. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 21:03, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
- The Logan & Reeves book is missing from the references section, and the seaforces link is still there. Parsecboy (talk) 10:23, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Parsecboy: Fixed now. -- Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 17:19, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Iazyges: - one last thing I didn't notice before - the intro doesn't mention the fact that she's preserved as a museum ship - could you add a line to that effect? I think that's the last thing I'd like to see. Parsecboy (talk) 11:59, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Parsecboy: Done. -- Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 16:35, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
- Now passed. Good job on the article. Parsecboy (talk) 16:45, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Parsecboy: Done. -- Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 16:35, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Iazyges: - one last thing I didn't notice before - the intro doesn't mention the fact that she's preserved as a museum ship - could you add a line to that effect? I think that's the last thing I'd like to see. Parsecboy (talk) 11:59, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Parsecboy: Fixed now. -- Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 17:19, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
- The Logan & Reeves book is missing from the references section, and the seaforces link is still there. Parsecboy (talk) 10:23, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Parsecboy: I believe I have done everything. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 21:03, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
- Sounds good, there's no rush. Parsecboy (talk) 12:54, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Parsecboy: yeah I forgot about this; I'll try to work on it later today if I can. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 12:37, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Warfare good articles
- GA-Class military history articles
- GA-Class maritime warfare articles
- Maritime warfare task force articles
- GA-Class Asian military history articles
- Asian military history task force articles
- GA-Class Japanese military history articles
- Japanese military history task force articles
- GA-Class Ships articles
- All WikiProject Ships pages
- GA-Class Japan-related articles
- Low-importance Japan-related articles
- WikiProject Japan articles