Talk:Japanese ska
 | This article was previously nominated for deletion. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | A fact from Japanese ska appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 January 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
[edit]This is seriously one of the most ridiculous articles/entries i have ever seen. The only thing that makes J-ska unique is that it is sung (sometimes) in Japanese. Other than that there is no discernible difference between J-ska and the rest of the worlds' ska. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.27.9.20 (talk) 09:57, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. UtherSRG (talk) 12:41, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
J-ska → Japanese ska – Not one of the article's sources, which by the way are mostly dead and unreliable, uses the name "J-ska". Therefore the word seems be simply a fan term, unlike J-pop which is actually used in the Japanese music industry. Xfansd (talk) 20:08, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
- Support: Short term (i.e. fan term) should only be used if sources indeed indicate common use of this term. This is not the case here. --RJFF (talk) 17:57, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Japanese ska. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927203234/http://www.psnw.com/~randyk/020498.htm to http://www.psnw.com/~randyk/020498.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070926230205/http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/lifestyle/html/20040325t180000-0500_57672_obs_ska___alive_and_kicking_but_outside_jamaica.asp to http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/lifestyle/html/20040325t180000-0500_57672_obs_ska___alive_and_kicking_but_outside_jamaica.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:29, 19 April 2017 (UTC)