Talk:Jerzy Sikorski

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Poland Low‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jerzy Sikorski. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100929123840/http://www.english.pan.pl/ to http://www.english.pan.pl/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:41, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

POV Check

The article needs to be checked for neutrality. There are sections that contain what appears to be uncited opinion. Wikipedia should never be using words like "slander" in our own voice. All opinion needs to be tied to a direct citation to a source.--Srleffler (talk) 02:44, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the section that threw around accusations of slander. I have not yet reviewed the entire article.--Srleffler (talk) 06:07, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tadeusz P. Wójcik

Tadeusz P. Wójcik, who is mentioned and cited in this article, appears to be its author. At File:Toruń of 1192 before first Teutonic Knights in 1231.jpg, user:Rosetecscc identifies himself as the copyright holder of the uploaded work, but the credit in the image itself is to Tadeusz P. Wójcik. I'm not sure whether Wójcik has a conflict of interest in editing this article, but he ought not to be citing his own work nor writing about himself on Wikipedia.--Srleffler (talk) 05:02, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Searching for Wójcik's 1990 reference led me to some videos online that refer to him and to "Rosetec Spatial Cybernetics Consortium". The content of the videos was somewhat helpful in evaluating the authorship of this article.--Srleffler (talk) 07:42, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disaster area

This article appears to be a disaster area. It looks like the subject had his own ideas about Cop, which is fair enough, but the article is reporting them at vastly excessive length. For example, Cop's death-date belongs on the Cop page, not here. If JS has a novel (correct) theory that is accepted, it belongs there, with a note here. If he has a novel (incorrect, not accepted) theory then it could have a somewhat longer note here, but the status of the idea should be clear William M. Connolley (talk) 07:59, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Currently the Copernicus section is almost unreadable and poorly related to the subject. I note as well the extreme shortness of the Polish language article on the subject. Rmhermen (talk) 04:23, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]