Talk:Jess Fishlock/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Kaiser matias (talk · contribs) 12:25, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
· · · |
- In the lead, note what league the Seattle Reign FC play in, and spell out what "FA WSL" is, or at least what the WSL refers to.
- Updated Hmlarson (talk) 17:27, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
- In Early life, you have "at age 16" and "at age sixteen;" stick with one, I think MOS suggests spelling out under 20 but consistency is the key.
- Updated Hmlarson (talk) 17:27, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
- Cardiff City LFC has no citations.
- Updated. Hmlarson (talk) 21:25, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
- First paragraph of the Bristol Academy section has no citation.
- Updated. Hmlarson (talk) 22:01, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
- After mentioning the National Women's Soccer League, give the abbreviation for it.
- Updated Hmlarson (talk) 17:27, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
- "Fishlock received a controversial red card..." is there any reason for the controversy? If so you should add it, if not it may not be necessary to note that.
- Expanded Hmlarson (talk) 17:27, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
- The 8–6–8 record is given the note explaining they're wins and losses, whereas a previous mention of a team record did not. Again, try to maintain consistency with that and either have all records linked like that, just the first mention, or none.
- Updated Hmlarson (talk) 17:27, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
- Any way to expand the coaching career section? This isn't an issue, just it would be good perhaps to include her record as a coach, or some detail like that, to make it a little more in depth.
- Added a few more sentences. Hmlarson (talk) 17:27, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
- References: 9, 15, 18, 36, and 54 are all dead.
- I ran broken link check and resolved all. The two left in the report (9 and 34) are working if you click on them. Hmlarson (talk) 21:25, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
Once these are taken care of I'll give it another look, but should be good at that point.
- Great it looks good now. Kaiser matias (talk) 00:51, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for your help Kaiser matias. Much appreciated. Hmlarson (talk) 01:27, 29 April 2017 (UTC)