Talk:Jetlag Productions
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]If this does not meet the notability guidlines, then we can delete the Disney article as well. This notability nonsense should be removed from the article, it is like requiring notability to be established for the Disney article, for example. This company may not be as old or as big as Disney, but their productions are of as high a quality and as loved as those of Disney, if not more. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.124.144.66 (talk) 17:31, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
- Though I disagree with the above statement and it goes without saying that Jetlag's animated films are neither as well known or appreciated nor of as high quality as Disney's, the subject is notable enough even if considerably more obscure. Few would consider Wikipedia as the primary source for articles relating to the Walt Disney Company, while the scare availability of information related to Jetlag Productions would make the Wikipedia article more valuable than one for Disney, which has plenty of more reliable sources than Wikipedia. T.W. (talk) 18:26, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class Animation articles
- Low-importance Animation articles
- Start-Class Animation articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Animation articles
- Start-Class Japan-related articles
- Low-importance Japan-related articles
- Japanese cinema task force articles
- WikiProject Japan articles
- Start-Class film articles
- Start-Class filmmaking articles
- Filmmaking task force articles
- Start-Class Japanese cinema articles
- WikiProject Film articles