Talk:Jill Trewhella

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Jill Trewhella is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Women scientists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

COI declaration

User:99of9 and User:Penn Syd wrote the first version of this article and are also employees of the University of Sydney, and as such may have a conflict of interest with the article subject. External editors are encouraged to review and edit the article. --99of9 (talk) 01:44, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Human Genome Project

This sentence is factually incorrect, or at least misleading:

Her team was involved in the Human Genome Project and sequenced chromosome 16.

I can understand the mistake: Trewhella was the director of Biosciences at LANL which was the group at LANL that worked on the Human Genome Project, ~~largely (entirely?) before she took on the role~~, but as the director of the organization she had media appearances and quoted in articles where she talked about the project on behalf of Biosciences at LANL. As a scientist she was not involved at all in the Human Genome project. Wrapperfunction (talk) 17:21, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Removed as it was based on an article by the subject..... can you provide an independent reference??? Regards, Ariconte (talk) 21:03, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't, I just have direct knowledge of the events as they unfolded. I skimmed the article she wrote, and it is, as I said, Trewhella talking about the work that Biosciences did ~~(before she took over)~~ as the administrative head of that division. It might be more accurate to say something like "She became director of B which was part of the team involved in the HGP" (rather than "her team was involved in HGP. She became director of B") but I think it stands better as it is now without the reference at all. Wrapperfunction (talk) 21:43, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

She was admin head of B during key parts of the HGP, but not scientifically involved. I don't have a citation handy, but wanted to make sure the talk page here wasn't misleading Wrapperfunction (talk) 13:41, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]