Jump to content

Talk:Johnny Broderick

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


GA Review

[edit]
Article promoted - 17 July 2014.
This review is transcluded from Talk:Johnny Broderick/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TLSuda (talk · contribs) 18:34, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! I know you've waited a few months for a review, but I have good news! I'm stuck in a tin can for 5 hours tomorrow late night UTC, so I'm going to use that time wisely to review this article. I expect to have the review posted in the early morning hours UTC the following day. (Approximately less than 36 hours from this post.) I look forward to reading and reviewing this article. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 18:15, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Why thank you! You know, all of a sudden, three of my GA nominees are being reviewed. Quite something. I guess prayer works. Coretheapple (talk) 18:43, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Initial review

[edit]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:
    B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    See image review below.
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    This is an extremely well written article. I only found one glaring issue: In the Allegations of misconduct section, it says "...against them. and of..." There are also some issues with one image. Just needs a bit of cleaning up and then I'd be happy to pass this article. TLSuda (talk) 15:21, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Coretheapple (talk) 16:58, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image review

[edit]

 Done Say, thanks very much for the review! Much appreciated. Coretheapple (talk) 16:58, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Let me know when you get the image fixed and I will promote this article. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 18:36, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I've actually removed the image as you suggested. I don't know how to fix that image, and as you point out WP:NFCC#8 seems to be a fatal flaw preventing use in this article under any circumstances. Coretheapple (talk) 21:15, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Aha, so you have! In that case, I'm happy to promote this article to Good Article! TLSuda (talk) 03:25, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Great! Thanks again. Coretheapple (talk) 13:31, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]