Jump to content

Talk:Jonathan Shaw (photographer)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Jonathan Shaw (photographer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:25, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declaration

[edit]

I am Wikimedian in Residence at Coventry University, based in the Disruptive Media Learning Lab, which Jonathan heads. I'm going to be making some changes to the article, which is out-of-date, and will stick, to cited, factual updates. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 09:01, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's commendable, but the man (who I don't know at all) is not a president, baseball player, cosmonaut, "Playmate", or similar, and thus is not somebody whose achievements, attributes, performance, timespans etc are likely to neatly match standard and oft-searched fields. So I don't see how a bio-infobox helps the article. Indeed, I wish you hadn't added it. (Is this very "uncollegial" of me?) Your other disruptions of the article are welcome. -- Hoary (talk) 09:22, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I note that {{Infobox photographer}} - whose purpose seems highly relevant - was merged into {{Infobox person}} (the template used here); while {{infobox academic}} also exists. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:29, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It seems that it was you who merged it or perhaps cleared up after the merge. For me, history merges are one of Wikipedia's many mysteries: I can't see any history for it. I wonder whether its creator had much of an interest in photography: I've seen quite a lot of articles on photographers (I've even perpetrated a few myself) but I don't remember encountering any photographer infobox. -- Hoary (talk) 12:55, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The article says "Newfotoscapes was selected as one of Lens Culture's "Best Photobooks of 2014"." I think this should be removed because Lens Culture is a site influenced by the fact photographers pay to be featured. -Lopifalko (talk) 12:22, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Another thing, when sourcing, please try to find independent reliable sources with significant coverage of the subject. An (admittedly) quick scan of the current sources shows only The Independent with the merest passing mention of Shaw (so that doesn't count) and the WSJ, which I cannot access. Independent reliable sources with significant coverage of the subject go a long way to demonstrating notability. Thanks. -Lopifalko (talk) 12:36, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I think the sources for the claims I have added are appropriate for the claims I have added. Please feel free to point out any examples where you disagree. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:22, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]