Talk:Joseph Sprigg/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk · contribs) 17:01, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
West Virginian Comments below,
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Issues
[edit]- It is unecessary to put citations like this: "bbbbbb.[1] cccccc, ddddddd.[1]"
- Dates shouldn't use "th" at the end
- Some of the sources require a subscription, please not that with a template.
- Four citations for one point seems excessive.
--Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 17:01, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
- Tomandjerry211 (alt), all of these issues have been addressed. Please let me know if you have any further questions or comments. Thank you again for the review! -- West Virginian (talk) 00:03, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
- Passing, well done!--Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 11:14, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
- Tomandjerry211 (alt), thank you tremendously for taking the time to engage in this very thoughtful review! -- West Virginian (talk) 13:20, 28 September 2015 (UTC)