Talk:Jugulator
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]"The Jugulator is about a being, part machine, part demon, designed to kill all the left over humans who were not saved by the rapture by the Painkiller. The painkiller (previous album) was structured as a fictional character who set out to save the people who listened to metal. This is the continuation, which is further continued in their album after Demolition, Angel of Retribution."
I have no idea where that is from so I removed it. If someone wants to rephrase it so it cites its source "Tipton said in an interview with so and so that..." so it doesn't just sound like fanfiction then please do. 86.130.146.221 23:18, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Judas Priest-Jugulator.jpg
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f7/Nuvola_apps_important.svg/70px-Nuvola_apps_important.svg.png)
Image:Judas Priest-Jugulator.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:06, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Genre
[edit]You guys this is ridiculous! You even mentioned in this article that this album has thrash symptoms, so give me a break, the genre is clearly not Heavy Metal or NWOBHM, with these low-pitched tunes, speedy and hard drum playing and rough singing... which by the way it reminds me that he uses a lot of low-pitched screams which is popular in thrash metal. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.108.249.67 (talk) 14:07, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
I think the genres should be GROOVE METAL, I think this defines the album the best (reminds me of Pantera's Cowboys From Hell), also THRASH METAL and only then HEAVY METAL. The fact all the related songs and the album itself has only HEAVY METAL in the genre is just poor and stupid... 84.111.104.137 (talk) 23:07, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
The distinctions (e.g. the "shift from speed metal to thrash metal") are basically bullshit. Having said that, I agree that groove metal is closer to correct. 63.229.172.96 (talk) 18:38, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
LastFM
[edit]I went to reformat the citations on the page since there was a bare link banner thing at the top of the page. When I visited the LastFM page that was cited, it was nothing more than content from this page. Therefore, I removed that citation, because leaving it would basically mean that this page is citing itself.--L1A1 FAL (talk) 03:24, 13 August 2011 (UTC)