This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lancashire and Cumbria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lancashire and CumbriaWikipedia:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaTemplate:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaLancashire and Cumbria articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
On 20 July 2015, she was one of 184 Labour MPs to abstain from the vote on the Conservative government's Welfare Reform and Work Bill, which restricted child benefit to the first two children in a family and lowered the benefit cap from £26,000 to £20,000 per household.[1] Labour's leadership had recommended its MPs abstain, but 48 of them backed an alternative motion opposing the Bill.[1] Cooper criticised those colleagues who had voted against the Bill, claiming a party split had let the Conservatives "off the hook".[2]
@This is Paul Thanks for bringing this to the talk page, and for finding an additional source. I'm still not really comfortable however as the quotes in it require quite a lot of interpretation. She seems to be implying that she voted inline with the party leadership, against her personal views, as part of a plan to make the Conservatives look bad. And then criticises those that voted inline with her own beliefs, for making the party look disunited. This has gone from the dull, a new MP votes as instructed to something quite controversial. I would prefer a better source, but if you must put it in off the current sources can you try to keep it as brief as possible? Trappedinburnley (talk) 18:47, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I hadn't quite interpreted it that way, but I get your point. I'll leave it for now as the Lancashire Telegraph seems to be the only outlet that printed this quote. As I started the article, over time I do want to expand it, but I'll draft anything new here first. This is Paul (talk) 19:08, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That is very reasonable, and I admit that there does seem to be something to it. I suppose it might just about work combined with a source focused on why the party opted to abstain? Trappedinburnley (talk) 20:33, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]