Jump to content

Talk:Junk (film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Japanese script

[edit]

Done. I confirmed it by this page.[1] In Japanese edition, "Junk" is capitalized. --Nightshadow28 14:20, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stub

[edit]

This article lacks (in the main text) all the basic information which should be contained in an introduction. Even though it is present in the infobox, the article still needs to begin with "Junk is a Japanese film directed by X and released in 2000." or the like. LordAmeth 13:01, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk08:44, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... that the cast and crew of the Japanese zombie film Junk, which made use of real meat for its gore effects, were sometimes unable to stomach meat for dinner after spending hours filming? Source: England, Norman (May 2003). "Who Made This Junk?". Fangoria. No. 222. Starlog Group, Inc. pp. 43–44. ISSN 0164-2111.
    • ALT1:... that the cast and crew of the Japanese zombie film Junk, which made use of real meat for its gore effects, were sometimes unable to stomach meat for dinner after hours spent filming? Source: England, Norman (May 2003). "Who Made This Junk?". Fangoria. No. 222. Starlog Group, Inc. pp. 43–44. ISSN 0164-2111.

5x expanded by MatthewHoobin (talk). Self-nominated at 21:34, 2 September 2021 (UTC).[reply]

  • This article has been expanded by a factor of five (97 words to 1,647) between August 26 and September 2. It's definitely long enough to qualify. Copyvio scanner returns nothing. Information is cited and neutrally written. Hook is cited and interesting. No real issues with grammar or spelling. The only image (the infobox image) has a legitimate fair-use rationale. Nominator doesn't have enough DYK credits for QPQ to be required -- this looks good to me. jp×g 19:16, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
ALT0 to T:DYK/P1