Talk:K-41 (Kansas highway)
Appearance
K-41 (Kansas highway) has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:K-41 (Kansas highway)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Racepacket (talk) 05:09, 9 April 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Thank you for nominating this article. No disamb. or invalid external links.
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A (prose):
- Lead: Please change Ottawa to Ottawa County.
- At first I asked myself whether "city limits" was proper terminology, but I have verified that Delphos is a full city despite its population and size.
- B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
- Although not a GA requirement, you might want to change [[Category:State highways in Kansas]] to [[Category:State highways in Kansas|041]] so that it will appear in the category in the same sort order as the other highways.
- A (prose):
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- I have not seen any problems so far.
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- Any future construction plans? Any American Recovery Act projects? I assume not.
- Would it be worth saying that K-41 is a two-lane highway its entire length?
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars.
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Although not a GA requirement, photographs of the highway are always nice to include.
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- This article represents significant work by its author. Putting review on hold for you to address concerns. Racepacket (talk) 05:51, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
- I believe I have fixed these. There are no future plans that I can find a source for (or find at all.) — PCB 05:12, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
- This article represents significant work by its author. Putting review on hold for you to address concerns. Racepacket (talk) 05:51, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
- Pass or Fail:
Congratulations on another Good Article. Racepacket (talk) 05:30, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Engineering and technology good articles
- GA-Class Kansas articles
- Low-importance Kansas articles
- WikiProject Kansas articles
- GA-Class U.S. state highway articles
- Low-importance U.S. state highway articles
- GA-Class Road transport articles
- Low-importance Road transport articles
- U.S. state highway articles
- GA-Class Kansas road transport articles
- Low-importance Kansas road transport articles
- Kansas road transport articles
- GA-Class U.S. road transport articles
- Low-importance U.S. road transport articles
- U.S. road transport articles