Talk:Kadist

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kadist. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131202234555/http://www.frieze.com/issue/review/enacting-populism-in-its-mediaescape/ to http://www.frieze.com/issue/review/enacting-populism-in-its-mediaescape/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:40, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

COI

Delpesco has self-identified as Joseph del Pesco, Director of the subject of this page. I also suspect Hrabben and NouvelleEtude of COI editing, but cannot substantiate that definitively.

Vegantics (talk) 21:50, 14 February 2024 (UTC) has no apparent connection to Kadist, the subject.[reply]

@Delpesco, I'm replying to the above comment to create a thread that allows ongoing replies, rather than continually editing the talk page. There is a procedure in place for editing articles where you have a conflict of interest. You can learn more at WP:COIE. This is necessary because you have an inherent bias on the topic which can be reflected in your edits, intentionally or otherwise. For instance, I noticed that some of your edits include language lifted directly from the Kadist website, which is certainly not an unbiased source. However, lack of unbiased Wikipedia editors is not grounds to edit an article yourself. If anything, it would suggest that a topic is not notable enough to merit having its own article. If you continue to edit articles where you have a conflict of interest, your account will likely be banned.

Vegantics (talk) 18:08, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I acknowledge (am being transparent) about making small corrections to this page. I am no longer editing this page, even if I could add many helpful sources and links. I note that there have been many other contributors to this page. I have only stated facts, and corrected neutrality errors. Thank you Wikipedia community for your contributions. Delpesco (talk) 15:39, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]