Talk:Kansas v. Colorado

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Kansas Low‑importance

	Kansas portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kansas, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Kansas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KansasWikipedia:WikiProject KansasTemplate:WikiProject KansasKansas articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Copyright concerns

I have temporarily restored the copyright problem template placed here and removed here, pending clarification. It may be that this material is public domain, and not Duke Law's own summary of the case, but I have not yet been able to verify that. Since there was no explanation for the removal tag, I do not know if copying is not a concern for some other reason and have requested feedback. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 12:17, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category problem

This article is miscategorized as Internal territorial disputes of the United States. This dispute does not involve a territorial dispute, but it does concern riparian rights and water usage. Someone correctly identified this earliers as Water case law.

Rustbelt Maps (talk) 15:54, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What does this mean?

In the 1943 section, bullet points 2 and 3 seem amiss. Is it something that needs to be fixed? If so, how? Dgndenver (talk) 13:29, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]