Jump to content

Talk:Karl Philipp, Prince of Schwarzenberg

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Move. —Wknight94 (talk) 17:40, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

[edit]

Karl Philipp Fürst zu SchwarzenbergKarl Philipp, Prince of Schwarzenberg – I tried undoing a bad move to Karl Philipp, Prince Schwarzenberg but had to stop because of a redirect. Schwarzenberg was an actual territory, so it needs to be preceded by "of". Charles 23:50, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

[edit]

Discussion

[edit]

Add any additional comments

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Critics

[edit]

Wishing to preserve his army is a poor excuse for Schwarzenbergs blunders both at Dresden and Leipzig, both of which could have cost him his complete army. At Dresden he was saved by the lucky events at Kulm/Nollendorf, at Leipzig the Tsar had to overrule Schwarzenberg to avert complete disaster in the south. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Poliorketes (talkcontribs) 18:53, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]