The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
E-Stylus (talk·contribs) has been paid by Kate Simon Studios on behalf of Kate Simon. Hired through Upwork.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography articles
@ChrisWar666: I don't think so. I suspect her contributions to those publications listed in "Featured works" is minor, thus I suggest we strip it back to the most notable and remove the majority of that list. The "Exhibitions" section is not overly long at all so I definitely do not think it worth breaking this out into a separate article. The "Select exhibitions and books" duplicates in prose what we have in the lists in the "Exhibitions", "Published works" and "Permanent collections" sections, so this duplicate should be able to be merged. -Lopifalko (talk) 11:27, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, perhaps I should have been more specific. I was thinking about breaking both sections out (together) precisely due to the fact that featured works was so large (and her contribution probably so minor). Agree with stripping back, and trying to find some notability (a mention in WP:RS?) for her participation in them. I think wikipedia prefers prose over lists, so I don't think we should remove the prose for now. (Obviously if it becomes hooked on minor details, as it is at e.g. Ha*Ash, it could be cleaned up a bit.) I also think the list form is useful for quick reference. I was going to remove the cannabis paper remark, but I don't mind trivia in prose so much shrugs. (I also moved the unsigned list below into this section) - ChrisWar666 (talk) 13:58, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Just to reply quickly to one of your points, "I think wikipedia prefers prose over lists", with photographers I've taken my cues in recent years with work that went before me and always favoured lists over prose for exhibitions, collections and books. I do like prose, but it's a lot harder, and exhibitions are kind of sundry, not the core work of someone's career in my opinion. Their core work would be more like the photographs themselves, hence lists seem a good way to succinctly get exhibitions out of the way, neatly parcelled off. Also, long prose descriptions about collections and exhibitions is laborious to read, where as a list can be quickly scanned. -Lopifalko (talk) 14:15, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I shall defer to your experience. This said, how much prose should be in the lists? I'm deleting this "The first major museum exhibition of rock music photography that toured across the USA and to New Zealand.[31]" from the group exhibitions section, and will have a look at another clean-up. - ChrisWar666 (talk) 15:13, 2 December 2019 (UTC) Edit: I've tried to clean it up a bit, and would like to do more - there are lots of citations, sometimes every sentence. I don't think we need so many, and none in the lead (unless Simon is a controversial figure? I was going to move birth ref over to the infobox, but left it in for now as a precaution) - ChrisWar666 (talk) 15:56, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
