Talk:Kenneth Tait
Appearance
Kenneth Tait has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: August 20, 2023. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Kenneth Tait/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 03:59, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Will review this one soon. Hog Farm Talk 03:59, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
As a starter question - what makes Wynne reliable? This source is self-published. Hog Farm Talk 03:03, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
- Wynn is well known for his work on biographical dictionaries of fighter pilots of the Battle of Britain. His book, "Men of the Battle of Britain" is a major reference work in this field and has been published three times beginning in 1989, the most recent being by Frontline Books. Much of the content from his 1981 book is repeated in the later works but in a slightly trimmed down form. Both are often cited by authors in the field, e.g. John Ray, Adam Claasen, Stephen Bungay, James Holland, Brian Cull, the 1981 book more so by NZ authors. The Battle of Britain Memorial Trust now have the rights to his work. I believe that on this basis he is a reliable source. Zawed (talk) 23:31, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
- That seems reasonable. Hog Farm Talk 02:15, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
- "By the time of the invasion of the Low Countries, Tait was back on operations." - I think it would be useful to most readers to provide an approximate calendar date for this
- Added mention of the month of the invasion. Zawed (talk) 07:42, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
- "He destroyed two enemy aircraft on 25 August, a Bf 110 and Bf 109 respectively" - a bit of a nitpick, but I don't think respectively is necessary here as this all occurred on the single day
- Deleted respectively. Zawed (talk) 07:42, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
- "Tait has no known grave" - again, a nitpick, but I think this can be ommitted since this would be expected with MIA status
- Deleted mention of no known grave. Zawed (talk) 07:42, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
No other concerns, good work here. Hog Farm Talk 02:43, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review, have actioned the above points. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 07:42, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Warfare good articles
- GA-Class biography articles
- GA-Class biography (military) articles
- Low-importance biography (military) articles
- Military biography work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- GA-Class New Zealand articles
- Low-importance New Zealand articles
- WikiProject New Zealand articles
- GA-Class military history articles
- GA-Class military aviation articles
- Military aviation task force articles
- GA-Class Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history articles
- Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force articles
- GA-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles
- GA-Class aviation articles
- GA-Class aerospace biography articles
- Aerospace biography task force articles
- WikiProject Aviation articles