Talk:Kilo

On 28 April 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved to Kilo (disambiguation). The result of the discussion was not moved.

Origin

is the prfix kilo latin —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.227.131.245 (talk • contribs) 22:18, 4 September 2008

No it's Greek (see kilo-). -- JediLofty ^{Talk to me}_{Follow me} 08:50, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

kilo es algo qu7e significa catorce —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.30.93.66 (talk) 16:03, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 28 April 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Favonian (talk) 19:45, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kilo → Kilo (disambiguation) – Kilo should redirect to Kilogram as its lead says it's "often simply called a kilo colloquially". fgnievinski (talk) 21:11, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose The prefix has greater long-term significance. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:14, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose People who say kilo for kilogram are well aware that it's a slangy clipping, and they won't type kilo into the search when they are looking for kilogram. Similarly, a well-written Wikipedia article won't use kilo where kilogram is meant. Indefatigable (talk) 00:36, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No obvious primary topic between the prefix or unit of mass. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 03:35, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
https://wikinav.toolforge.org/?language=en&title=Kilo shows that most people click on the first two entries in the list, in that order, so it doesn't seem like there's much to do here. --Joy (talk) 08:05, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – backwards logic for proposal: it would require that "kilo" most often refers to the kilogram (which is false). Even the assertion used has dubious validity, and should be removed. —Quondum 21:14, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.