Jump to content

Talk:Kinked demand

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
tagged Cretog8 (talk) 20:30, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Meaning

[edit]

I'm sorry but I started to read this and it makes no sense whatsoever.

I realise that anyone coming here looking for this may know a little about the subject, but surely this could be made a little more reader-friendly for the rest of us?

Georgec2 17:11, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions?

[edit]

Are there any suggestions on how this could be made more friendly to the casual reader?

i think it can be made more reader friendly by giving examples such as this type of model applies to FMCG s such as pepsi and lays. . . Radhika Asrani BetsyWalls 00:02, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So what's the "Chicago theory"?

[edit]

The quote in the criticism section says:

Stigler also asserts that the model is unnecessary because Chicago theory already included allowances for short-run sticky prices due to collusion, menu costs, and regulatory or bureaucratic inefficiencies in markets

So what is this "Chicago theory"? I couldn't find a WP article about it, but I believe it would benefit the casual reader if more information was available on what it means.

Thanks, nyenyec  a casual reader 16:18, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

formatting error

[edit]

Please correct the quote error in the formatting of the CRITICISM section

G. Robert Shiplett 02:14, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

merge Price point into Kinked demand

[edit]

merge Price point into this Kinked demand article. Jonpatterns (talk) 18:03, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image

[edit]

The image for this article makes no sense and I'm sure is a mistake. Any ideas on what to replace it with? Paoshf (talk) 14:28, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]