Jump to content

Talk:Kirstine Stewart

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kirstine Stewart. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:37, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Layfield

[edit]

This note is to clarify the reason why her former married name "Layfield" is mentioned in the article, because more than one attempt has been made to remove it in the past. The problem is that the sources used to support a lot of the earlier content refer to her as "Kirstine Layfield" rather than "Kirstine Stewart" — so while it's certainly not our business to publish privacy-invading content about her personal life, our article does have to at least briefly mention the fact that "Kirstine Layfield" was the same person as "Kirstine Stewart" so that our readers don't get confused by the sources. There's no case for our article saying anything more about the matter than it already does, but there's no acceptable reason for it to say nothing about the fact that she was formerly known as Layfield. Bearcat (talk) 22:00, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]