Talk:Knowledge retention

	This redirect was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This redirect was accepted from this draft on 17 May 2020 by reviewer Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs).

Business

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles

Distinct from KM article

I can't see enough material here to justify it being an article and there is a strong danger that it replicates the KM article which is hardly overlong -----Snowded ^TALK 17:37, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To expand on this point - knowledge retention is a topic within knowledge management but there is no evidence it is distinct as a subject. There is no source in this article which establishes that. The basic distinction on method is indirectly supported by one third party reference and more directly from a journal article fairly evidently written by the person who created this article in the first place. A simple google search says that person runs a KM consultancy practice and I susect we are seeing a particular approach to KM being given a separate article in Wikipedia to add authority. There are no references to support the method distinction made which is original research.

To be honest I am suprised this got through any review and unless someone can explain (with third party references) why this is distinct I am going to nominate it for deletion. -----Snowded ^TALK 06:36, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]