Jump to content

Talk:Koichi Kato (politician, born 1939)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

errors

[edit]

you do have an article called Kato Koichi. It has several errors, the worst being the date of Kato being LDP secretary general. It also calims that the highly corrupt Ozawa ia a reformist. --203.112.2.202 05:10, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fire

[edit]

I've removed the following "after he criticized Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi's 2006 visit to the Yasukuni Shrine." and changed it to read that the fire was in relation to the aniversary of Japan's defeat.

If you disagree, please discuss.

perfectblue 11:23, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 20 December 2016

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: pages moved. Andrewa (talk) 13:39, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


– Using the abbreviation of each politician's party seems an unnatural method of disambiguating. By profession and year of birth seems to be the most common method. Alternatively, we could disambiguate by their constituency; the former Kato represented Yamagata Prefecture districts while the latter represented Tokyo districts. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 00:59, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Question these presumably aren't the only 2 on the whole project? I suspect that in many cases the party will be more useful. Politicians aren't football players whose biodata (because they age quickly) is easily available. The most obvious disambiguator is the the party. In ictu oculi (talk) 10:39, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • Yes, they appear to be the only two on the English Wikipedia. As for the Japanese Wiki, they have a list of articles that start with the characters "加藤" here. They are not arranged in "alphabetical" order though, which makes searching tougher. But after a scroll through I was able to find ja:加藤弘一, a literary critic, as well as ja:加藤幸一 and ja:加藤耕一, both professors. Those articles in their current form would probably fail the English wiki notability requirements, but they show it is a common name. Since Kato is apparently the tenth most common Japanese surname, there are bound to be more notable people named Kocihi Kato in the future, but that is irrelevant for the current discussion.
As for the availability of biodata, profiles on government websites (e.g. the House of Reps website) provide such biographical details. I am also yet to see a campaign website that does not delve deep into the candidate's personal details (most even go as far as revealing their blood type). So I do not consider lack of data an issue.
It might be worth mentioning that the younger Kato was dumped by the DPJ before the 2014 election and that party no longer exists. According to the Japanese wiki article on him, he considered running as an independent in 2014 but ultimately didn't. If he makes a comeback in the future it will not be as a DPJ candidate, but currently he is known only for being a DPJ politician.
If consensus is that the party is the best disambiguator, then I think the word "politician" should at least be added afterwards. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 02:19, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - I agree with the nominator that, given that they are the only two such politicians on teh Wiki, and their age difference is qutie significant, this will be the best way to disambiguate them.  — Amakuru (talk) 10:53, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Koichi Kato (politician, born 1939). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:13, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Koichi Kato (politician, born 1939). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:59, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]