Talk:Králický Sněžník
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]The usual naming conventions on Wiki would suggested to chose one of the names- either Śnieżnik or Králický Sněžník.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 15:55, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Well. The same situation is with Śnieżka / Sněžka and many other articles. I know it is against naming conventions but I have no problem with double name (according to WP:IAR) :). - Darwinek 20:21, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
- When you put it that way... better to "let the sleeping dogs lie" :) -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 21:11, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, the reason to avoid double names is the barking about which comes first. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 04:53, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
- When you put it that way... better to "let the sleeping dogs lie" :) -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 21:11, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Proposed move
[edit]There is a proposal to rename this page and other similar ones. Please see Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (geographic names)/Archives/2008/November#Undoubling and discuss there.--Kotniski (talk) 17:47, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
Skywalk / new tourist attraction
[edit]Wired Germany reported about a new touristic attraction: a skywalk with mega slide at this mountain. https://www.wired.de/collection/latest/tschechische-architekten-bauen-ein-riesiges-holzgestell-mit-rutsche