Talk:Kriya (company)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kriya (company) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on 24 February 2014. The result of the discussion was Keep.

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 4 February 2012 by reviewer Chiswick Chap (talk · contribs).

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

Tatiana.grehan (talk · contribs) has been paid by Chelsea Digital on behalf of MarketInvoice.

Factoring or invoice discounting?

Since the receivables being sold, not borrowed against, isn't this an online factoring service rather than invoice discounting service? If so, I don't think we need to link to Invoice discounting in See also and we should mention factoring (and link to it's page) in the body of the article. Joja lozzo 00:03, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and fixed this. Joja lozzo 00:14, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Self Promotion?

The article contains a large number of links, many of which I think are self promotional eg the links to awards that the company has won.

is this acceptable?

Factoringsolutions (talk) 13:01, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

imho this article does not have any encyclopedic relevance and thus should be deleted. "MarketInvoice" is an irrelevant (small) a company as I can read in the sources. --193.175.98.136 (talk) 14:09, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It should definitely be deleted. The company is small as per the sources and this article is clearly self-promotional. 94.12.89.249 (talk) 00:20, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have started the discussion of the de;etion p[roposal at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MarketInvoice by copying 94.12.89.249's comment above and adding my own contribution. Joja lozzo 04:46, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Should be deleted! 87.138.101.117 (talk) 09:23, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Should be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Martin Cable (talk • contribs)

This was discussed in March 2014 at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MarketInvoice. It seems unlikely to be overturned. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 23:21, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on MarketInvoice. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:31, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wikipedia editors! I am a paid contributor (user name Tatiana.grehan). After some changes that I made for this article on October 16th-18th 2019 have been deleted, I have disclosed the fact of being a paid contributor but the disclosure seems to have been deleted as well. The contents of my sandbox which I was using for drafting were erased. Please advise if and how I can continue to work on editing this article in order to address the multiple issues highlighted for this article by editors (for this purpose new copy has been provided by the company itself). Thank you in advance for your kind advice as how to proceed.Tatiana.grehan (talk) 13:47, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 27 November 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: MOVED to MarketFinance. (non-admin closure) CThomas³ (talk) 17:46, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MarketInvoice → MarketFinance – MarketInvoice was re-named MarketFinance on 11/11/2019, with the public announcement made on 12/11/2019. This re-name included updating the company's registered name to MarketFinance: https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/07330525/filing-history ScentedCandleOwner (talk) 10:58, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support the company has fully renamed and the name change has been reported on. Note: I updated the name in the article along with the logo. – BrandonXLF (talk) 22:06, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.