Talk:LGBTQ rights in Arizona

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

United States: Arizona Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Arizona portal This article is supported by WikiProject Arizona (assessed as Low-importance).

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on LGBT rights in Arizona. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:04, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Signature certification

A recent addition regarding a ballot initiative in Mesa said that the signatures had been certified. However, the source for that info was this tweet, and if you check that tweet, it links to a source that says just the opposite - that there is still a several day period for those signatures to be challenged (and that concurs with the source already in the section.) As such, I have removed the claim and the use of the tweet as a reference. (I also removed the word "forcibly" to describe the placing of an initiative on the ballot; a ballot initiative is a fairly standard democratic process, and I can't think of anywhere else where placing something on a ballot is considered "forcible". ) --Nat Gertler (talk) 19:04, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]