Talk:Lachancea kluyveri
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
Classification
[edit]S. kluyverii has been reclassified as Lachancea kluyverii, see: DOI: 10.1016/S1567-1356(03)00175-2 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.198.71.141 (talk) 23:17, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
Requested move
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. Strong consensus including input from the relevant WikiProject, no need to wait until a second discussion period expires. Andrewa (talk) 10:25, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
Saccharomyces kluyveri → Lachancea kluyveri – This organism was formerly classified as belonging to the Saccharomyces genus. However, after more detailed analysis of phylogenetic data, it became clear that it is more appropriate to place it in the genus Lachancea. The research article accessible at doi:10.1016/S1567-1356(03)00175-2 explains the details of this analysis. The website of the Genolevures consortium at http://genolevures.org/sakl.html also notes this reclassification. The page should be renamed to "Lachancea kluyveri", with "Saccharomyces kluyveri" redirecting there. --Relisted. Andrewa (talk) 15:15, 17 November 2014 (UTC) 146.6.213.10 (talk) 00:58, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
- Relisting comment: A borderline one to close as move but I cannot make any sense of the refs supplied by nom, I suspect purely because I'm not knowledgeable in the area, so I've posted a heads-up at the relevant WikiProject. [1] Andrewa (talk) 15:22, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
- Support. Uncontroversial move. Both Index Fungorum and MycoBank give Lachancea kluyveri as the current name for this species. Sasata (talk) 20:37, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: Exactly the advice I was after, thank you! Andrewa (talk) 08:27, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
- Support: I also concur with the move. Medmyco (talk) 00:38, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.