Talk:Lad, A Dog/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 19:43, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Checking against GA criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- I made a few minor copy-edits
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- Charterhouse as used in 4 references goes to a dismabiguation page with no mention of teh publisher, please remove Wikilinks.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
I am happy to pass this, but please note the point about the Charterhouse disambiguation above. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:05, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
- Great, thanks. Fixed the Charterhouse links :-) -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 20:10, 28 December 2009 (UTC)