Talk:Lather, rinse, repeat
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Talk
[edit]While the current content of this article is completely stupid and inane, I recall that the shampoo company that added "repeat" to the instructions did so while sales were declining, and managed to vastly increase revenue with the gimmick, since people had to use twice as much shampoo. I don't have a source for this, which is why it's in the talk page. I was hoping to find here which was the company that did this, and was grossly disappointed to see this page here. --RealGrouchy 18:20, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
See also:
http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/1999/10/11/267035/index.htm —Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.87.1.170 (talk) 19:59, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
Too me the article is useful
[edit]I don't think that this article is completely stupid, and too me it's been helpful. As I'm not a native speaker, let alone from the United States, I've stumbled over the phrase 'rinse and repeat' and wikipedia (once again) got me the clue, what was meant. So please, do not remove it. 85.178.211.103 (talk) 05:23, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
- You might brush up, on the, use of, commmas, when you get, the opportunity too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.158.48.13 (talk) 10:22, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Feedback
[edit]To me, the article reads like an over-analyzed joke. Suggest moving it to Wiktionary (if it's not already there). - Mike Rosoft (talk) 05:45, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Lather, rinse, repeat. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20041117080553/http://www.cs.duke.edu:80/courses/summer04/cps001/lectures/Lecture3.pdf to https://www.cs.duke.edu/courses/summer04/cps001/lectures/Lecture3.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:46, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lather, rinse, repeat. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041117080553/https://www.cs.duke.edu/courses/summer04/cps001/lectures/Lecture3.pdf to https://www.cs.duke.edu/courses/summer04/cps001/lectures/Lecture3.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:59, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
different meaning
[edit]While "Lather, rinse, repeat" may mean all that has been said here, and I found it interesting to read (including the link in the Talk page), I was redirected from "Wash, rinse, repeat" which I was originally looking up, for its origin. I would use THAT phrase to mean something repetitive, or repetitive from day to day, such as "The Dow Jones has gone up today," "The Dow Jones has gone down today," "The Kardashians have done something or other," wash, rinse, repeat. Can anyone add any citations for that meaning of that variant? 74.66.250.74 (talk) 12:34, 25 February 2018 (UTC)