Talk:Lens antenna
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Really bad introduction
[edit]A typical stub written by a sophomore college student who wants to show off his buzzwords. The introduction gives almost no information useful to general readers. It doesn't even explain how a lens for microwaves differs from an optical lens, what it is made of, how it is used in an antenna, why lens antennas are limited to the microwave band, what applications they are used for, who invented them, or their advantages and disadvantages. --ChetvornoTALK 16:22, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for your suggestion. When you believe an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the edit this page link at the top.
The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons you might want to). --Srleffler (talk) 17:22, 14 June 2020 (UTC)- Thanks, am rewriting it right now. When I find a sloppy stub like this, written by a technically knowledgeable editor who obviously could have written a comprehensible introduction but instead has let his ego trump ACCESSIBILITY, MTAU and simply written a few JARGONy sentences on whatever aspects of the subject interest him, I usually leave a note like the above, listing what's wrong with it. Feedback on pages is useful for any editors who come after to improve it. --ChetvornoTALK 13:35, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
- Rewrote article --ChetvornoTALK 20:26, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
- Nicely done.--Srleffler (talk) 05:04, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
- Rewrote article --ChetvornoTALK 20:26, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks, am rewriting it right now. When I find a sloppy stub like this, written by a technically knowledgeable editor who obviously could have written a comprehensible introduction but instead has let his ego trump ACCESSIBILITY, MTAU and simply written a few JARGONy sentences on whatever aspects of the subject interest him, I usually leave a note like the above, listing what's wrong with it. Feedback on pages is useful for any editors who come after to improve it. --ChetvornoTALK 13:35, 15 June 2020 (UTC)